Y'all I am new and this is the first "kerfluffle" I've seen. I am not a miner and did not participate in the ziplex spree, I am not directly affected by what happened and am too new to see the ramifications of any indirect consequence of this event. So this is from a new-player perspective, as such I've followed the thread carefully and would just like to share my thoughts.
What seemingly happened was, Ziplexs are dropping from mining boxes more than intended, more people open them hoping to catch the wave, seems like a totally normal and natural thing. Imagine if you were a hunter, and you see people constantly hitting big globals or small hofs on some mob like feffoids, would you not proceed and shoot some feffoids yourself, if you could? How is anyone supposed to differentiate between "this is awesome! great loot! MA charity day!" and "this is clearly wrong, something's messed up, not working as intended"
To that point, someone posted that the number of ziplex looted/found in 24 hours quickly surpassed all of those found the prior year. As a new player, I wouldn't know that. And if I was opening mining boxes, and got a ziplex I'm not going to stop what I'm doing, see how many were looted, see how many were looted the prior year etc, no I'm going to open another box. There's also no way of knowing
as it's happening what it's going to end up being. If only 5 players opened boxes that day and only 10 ziplex's were found, is it still a bug then?
I'm not trying to defend those that tried to overtly capitalize on this bug. I'm trying to come to grips with how I'm supposed to decide if the "loot" (it's not really loot right? It's a purchased asset), but how am I supposed to decide if what I'm getting is too-good and problematic.
While I'm not a miner and this doesn't impact me, I will say it hits close. What I've done as part of my diving-in to Entropia experience, is buy 1k of each seasonal strongbox. And if in my opening of summer boxes I found a summer ring, better believe I'm going to continue opening them (for 1: because I just got a ring!!, and 2: because it was my plan to open 1k. I did 1k Christmas, then 1k summer). If another ring drops, another box is getting opened. Now at some point I absolutely would think "somethings going on here" and stop, but where that number is, I couldn't tell you. Also the way in which I opened them - I'm not entirely sure I would even know while it's happening? I just held down space bar the whole time for my box opening, I wouldn't have any way to see as the opening is happening, if I got 1 ring or 10 rings of 200 rings or 0 rings. (Got 1 athenic adjusted btw).
Totally get and respect that there was clear abuse, but that feels like the benefit of hindsight. Because again, in the moment, in a relative vacuum, how would an unconnected individual know that what they're doing isn't right at the time? This is probably one of the best summations in this thread and a quick shout out to Krill for the analogy:
If you put a dollar into a vending machine and it gives you two dollars back and a soda, it's a bug. If you stand there for two hours feeding the machine dollars, you're exploiting the bug. Pretty straight forward.
Speaking ONLY to the first instance, are you responsible for giving back the extra dollar? It was not your fault the machine gave it to you, it's the service technician. You take that dollar say thanks to the machine and be on your way. Whole-heartedly agree that if you pursue with malicious intent to abuse the system, you are exploiting the bug. But I don't see how you can punish individuals who tried to catch a wave. I almost feel like they should've just picked a number (# of ziplex looted less than X 'no problem, our fault, enjoy', greater than X rewards taken back, boxes returned, greater than Y more severe etc)
From what I've read, the ziplex spree was a mistake, it was MA's mistake, and it was a bug, their bug that people exploited in the sense of "took advantage of". So them saying players are "guilty of this exploit" seems disrespectful, scapegoating, and mislabeled. MA is guilty of the bug that players exploited is more accurate.
Maybe this is a language barrier thing, but language matters, especially when money is involved.
Players are locked during an investigation. This is a standard practice while we investigate a situation. Further punishment will be given to those who we find guilty of this exploit!
Again, I don't have a dog in this fight. I was not impacted apart from the "ooooooo's" and "ahhhhhhhhh's" of watching this unfold, and just want to share a new player perspective. If I have facts wrong, I certainly apologize and mean no disrespect or offense to anyone.
Cheers and have a blessed friday everyone.
edit:typos mostly